How Agent-browser scored an A.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
GitHub credibility score
code
75/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 12 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 1d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 83 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 44% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 100 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 42,369 stars (log-damped)
- ↓ Star authenticity: engagement of 0.11 per star — star signal discounted by 4%
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
80/100- ✓ Organisation: Built by Vercel · notable organisation (verified: Org profile shows a Verified badge stating the organization vercel controls the domain vercel.com; profile website https://vercel.com, description "Agentic infrastructure for every app and agent.". The mapped org vercel-labs also shows a Verified badge for vercel.com.)
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 1d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
community
64/100- – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 6 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool
Identity and Community did not lower this score. Identity and Community can only ever add. They did not raise the average for Agent-browser, so the score shown is the one it would have without them. The components are still listed above, with their real values.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.