← AutoGen
How AutoGen scored a C.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
C
62/100
GitHub credibility score
code
53/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 33 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 160d ago
- ↓ Commit cadence: 0 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 82% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 1 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 60,959 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
80/100- ✓ Organisation: Built by Microsoft · notable organisation (verified: Org profile shows a Verified badge for opensource.microsoft.com and microsoft.com; profile website https://opensource.microsoft.com, description "Open source projects and samples from Microsoft", location Redmond, WA.)
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
45/100- ↓ Last shipped: last commit 160d ago — fast-churn frameworks are expected to ship about every 60d
community
79/100- – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 10 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.