← Cavekit
How Cavekit scored a D.
Public-signal score, discounted for bought-star and bot-stargazer patterns — not a user rating. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
D
44/100
GitHub credibility score
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor — 4 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency — last commit 33d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence — 3 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio — 15% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence — 4 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped) — 1,108 stars (log-damped)
- ✓ Star authenticity — organic star growth — no velocity anomaly
- ↓ Engagement-to-star ratio — low engagement (0.11 per star) — possible inflated stars
| Quality signal | Measured | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors & bus-factor | 4 recent contributors — concentrated | 20% | +1 |
| Commit recency | last commit 33d ago | 20% | +18 |
| Commit cadence | 3 commits in 90 days | 15% | +4 |
| Issue close ratio | 15% of issues closed | 15% | +2 |
| Release cadence | 4 releases in 12 months | 15% | +9 |
| Stars (log-damped) | 1,108 stars (log-damped) | 15% | +11 |
| Quality subtotal (Q) | 100% | 45 | |
Authenticity multiplier (A)
× 0.96- ✓ Star authenticity — organic star growth — no velocity anomaly
- ↓ Engagement-to-star ratio — low engagement (0.11 per star) — possible inflated stars
Quality 45 × authenticity 0.96 = 44/100
Quality signals add up to the subtotal; the authenticity multiplier then discounts bought-star / bot-stargazer patterns. How scores are calculated.