← Caveman Code
How Caveman Code scored a C.
Public-signal score, discounted for bought-star and bot-stargazer patterns — not a user rating. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
C
48/100
GitHub credibility score
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor — 5 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency — last commit 30d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence — 73 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio — 31% of issues closed
- ↓ Release cadence — 0 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped) — 814 stars (log-damped)
- ✓ Star authenticity — organic star growth — no velocity anomaly
- ✓ Engagement-to-star ratio — healthy engagement (0.19 per star)
| Quality signal | Measured | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors & bus-factor | 5 recent contributors — concentrated | 20% | +1 |
| Commit recency | last commit 30d ago | 20% | +18 |
| Commit cadence | 73 commits in 90 days | 15% | +13 |
| Issue close ratio | 31% of issues closed | 15% | +5 |
| Release cadence | 0 releases in 12 months | 15% | +0 |
| Stars (log-damped) | 814 stars (log-damped) | 15% | +10 |
| Quality subtotal (Q) | 100% | 47 | |
Authenticity multiplier (A)
× 1.00- ✓ Star authenticity — organic star growth — no velocity anomaly
- ✓ Engagement-to-star ratio — healthy engagement (0.19 per star)
Quality 47 × authenticity 1.00 = 48/100
Quality signals add up to the subtotal; the authenticity multiplier then discounts bought-star / bot-stargazer patterns. How scores are calculated.