How Context7 scored an A+.

• code

  85/100
  • ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 12 recent contributors
  • ✓ Commit recency: last commit 1d ago
  • ✓ Commit cadence: 108 commits in 90 days
  • ✓ Issue close ratio: 99% of issues closed
  • ✓ Release cadence: 100 releases in 12 months
  • ✓ Stars (log-damped): 61,773 stars (log-damped)
  • ↓ Star authenticity: engagement of 0.10 per star — star signal discounted by 10%
  • – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query

• identity

  Not measured
  • – Identity: not yet active — activates with verified publisher claims

• audits

  Not measured
  • – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries

• freshness

  100/100
  • ✓ Last shipped: last commit 1d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d

• community

  76/100
  • – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
  • ✓ Hacker News mentions: 9 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool

Community did not lower this score. Community can only ever add. It did not raise the average for Context7, so the score shown is the one it would have without it. The component is still listed above, with its real value.

Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.