← Ephemora-cell
How Ephemora-cell scored a B.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
B
66/100
GitHub credibility score
code
52/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 2 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 7d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 283 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 29% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 10 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 48 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check skipped — low star count
- ↓ Dependent repos: no public repos depend on it yet
identity
Not measured- – Identity: no verified provenance yet
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last release 7d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
- ✓ Registry listing: still listed on a registry 0d ago
community
Not measured- – Community: no community signal yet — nobody has recommended it, posted about it, or shared it on Hacker News
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.