This is an early release preview. You may encounter bugs.
Garak logo
Unclaimed

Tool security

Garak

Command-line vulnerability scanner that probes LLMs for jailbreaks, prompt injection, data leakage, toxicity, and other failures

Built by NVIDIA

A 80/100 GitHub score ? This grade is derived from GitHub signals, not user votes. Open for the full breakdown.
Discussion

01 / Summary

About Garak.

Garak (Generative AI Red-teaming and Assessment Kit) is a command-line scanner that checks whether a language model or dialog system can be made to fail in unwanted ways. It probes for hallucination, data leakage, prompt injection, misinformation, toxicity, jailbreaks, and other weaknesses, playing a role for LLMs similar to what nmap or the Metasploit Framework play for networks.

A scan pairs a generator (the model under test) with probes (the attack prompts) and detectors (checks that decide whether an output shows the failure). Probes can be static, dynamic, or adaptive, and by default a run tries every known probe with the detectors each probe recommends. For every probe, the output reports a pass or fail per detector with the failure rate, and each run writes a JSONL report plus a hit log of the attempts that produced a vulnerability.

Generators cover Hugging Face models (local pipelines, the Inference API, and private endpoints), OpenAI chat and completion models, Replicate, Cohere, Groq, AWS Bedrock (Claude, Llama, Titan, AI21, Cohere, and Mistral models), NVIDIA NIM endpoints, LiteLLM, GGUF and ggml models through llama.cpp, and any REST endpoint returning text or JSON. Probes, detectors, evaluators, generators, and harnesses are all plugin classes, so new attacks or targets are added by subclassing a base class.

  • Probe library: DAN-style jailbreaks, encoding-based prompt injection, PromptInject, adversarial suffixes (GCG), glitch tokens, and Unicode perturbations
  • Content-risk probes: toxicity (RealToxicityPrompts), Language Model Risk Cards, malware generation, misleading claims, and questions a model should refuse
  • Leakage and hallucination checks: training-data replay, snowballed hallucination, package hallucination, and cross-site exfiltration attempts
  • Automated attack generation: a red-teaming model probes the target and adapts to its responses
  • Detectors: each probe names primary and extended detectors that judge whether an output shows the failure mode
  • Model targets: Hugging Face, OpenAI, Replicate, Cohere, Groq, AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM, LiteLLM, GGUF models through llama.cpp, and generic REST endpoints
  • Reporting: per-probe failure rates, a JSONL report of every attempt, a hit log of successful attacks, and an analysis script for the prompts with the most hits
  • Plugin architecture: probes, detectors, evaluators, generators, and harnesses inherit from base classes and can be extended with custom modules

02 / Discussion CREDIBILITY-GATED

Discussion

Reading is open to everyone. Posting and voting need a verified identity or a GitHub grade of B or higher.

  • No discussions yet.

04 / Build

Build with Garak.

Browse the catalog for frameworks, tools, and harnesses, each scored on real GitHub credibility.

Get Garak →

Browse the catalog