How Google Workspace CLI scored a B.

A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.

01 / Breakdown

Derived from GitHub, not voted.

67/100

GitHub credibility score

code
58/100
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 16 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 163d ago
- ↓ Commit cadence: 0 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 58% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 44 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 30,889 stars (log-damped)
- ↓ Star authenticity: engagement of 0.09 per star — star signal discounted by 15%
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
Not measured
- – Identity: no verified provenance yet
audits
Not measured
- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
88/100
- ↓ Last shipped: last commit 163d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
community
68/100
- – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 7 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool

Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.