← Hermes
How Hermes scored an A.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
A
86/100
GitHub credibility score
code
80/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 13 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 0d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 21945 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 49% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 32 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 244,186 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
Not measured- – Identity: no verified provenance yet
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 0d ago — fast-churn harnesss are expected to ship about every 60d
community
46/100- ✓ Recommends: credibility-weighted recommend mass 1.0 from 1 builder
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 4 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool
Community did not lower this score. Community can only ever add. It did not raise the average for Hermes, so the score shown is the one it would have without it. The component is still listed above, with its real value.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.