How Higgsfield scored a D.

A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.

01 / Breakdown

Derived from GitHub, not voted.

15/100

GitHub credibility score

code
19/100
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 4 recent contributors
- ↓ Commit recency: last commit 982d ago
- ↓ Commit cadence: 0 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 21% of issues closed
- ↓ Release cadence: 0 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 6,139 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
Not measured
- – Identity: no verified provenance yet
audits
Not measured
- – Third-party scans: not measurable — no registry listings for this tool
freshness
0/100
- ↓ Last shipped: last release 943d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
community
23/100
- – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 1 Hacker News story pointing at this tool
- – Signal depth: sparse data — this is an early reading from very few data points

Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.