← LangGraph
How LangGraph scored an A.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
A
89/100
GitHub credibility score
code
81/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 17 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 4d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 128 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 66% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 100 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 41,551 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
80/100- ✓ Organisation: Built by LangChain · notable organisation (verified: No verified-domain badge shown on the org profile at check time; profile website https://www.langchain.com, display name LangChain, description "The agent engineering platform.", location United States of America.)
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 4d ago — fast-churn frameworks are expected to ship about every 60d
community
100/100- – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 45 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool
Identity did not lower this score. Identity can only ever add. It did not raise the average for LangGraph, so the score shown is the one it would have without it. The component is still listed above, with its real value.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.