← LLM
How LLM scored an A.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
A
82/100
GitHub credibility score
code
75/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 14 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 3d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 205 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 57% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 16 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 12,487 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
60/100- ✓ Person: Created by Simon Willison · notable person
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 3d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
community
Not measured- – Community: no community signal yet — nobody has recommended it, posted about it, or shared it on Hacker News
Identity did not lower this score. Identity can only ever add. It did not raise the average for LLM, so the score shown is the one it would have without it. The component is still listed above, with its real value.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.