This is an early release preview. You may encounter bugs.
← LLM

How LLM scored a B.

A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.

01 / Breakdown

Derived from GitHub, not voted.

B
79/100

GitHub credibility score

  • code

    71/100
    • ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 25 recent contributors — concentrated
    • ✓ Commit recency: last commit 4d ago
    • ✓ Commit cadence: 170 commits in 90 days
    • ✓ Issue close ratio: 57% of issues closed
    • ✓ Release cadence: 17 releases in 12 months
    • ✓ Stars (log-damped): 12,668 stars (log-damped)
    • – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
    • ✓ Dependent repos: 12 public repos depend on it
  • identity

    60/100
    • ✓ Person: Created by Simon Willison · notable person
  • audits

    Not measured
    • – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
  • freshness

    100/100
    • ✓ Last shipped: last commit 4d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
    • ✓ Registry listing: still listed on a registry 0d ago
  • community

    Not measured
    • – Community: no community signal yet — nobody has recommended it, posted about it, or shared it on Hacker News

Identity did not lower this score. Identity can only ever add. It did not raise the average for LLM, so the score shown is the one it would have without it. The component is still listed above, with its real value.

Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.