← NANDA Adapter
How NANDA Adapter scored a D.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
D
8/100
GitHub credibility score
code
11/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 4 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 318d ago
- ↓ Commit cadence: 0 commits in 90 days
- ↓ Issue close ratio: 0% of issues closed
- ↓ Release cadence: 0 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 55 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check skipped — low star count
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
Not measured- – Identity: no verified provenance yet
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: not measurable — no registry listings for this tool
freshness
0/100- ↓ Last shipped: last commit 318d ago — fast-churn frameworks are expected to ship about every 60d
community
Not measured- – Community: no community signal yet — nobody has recommended it, posted about it, or shared it on Hacker News
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.