← NanoMuse
How NanoMuse scored a C.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
C
64/100
GitHub credibility score
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 2 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 0d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 2279 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 15% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 50 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 3,047 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- ✓ Engagement-to-star ratio: healthy engagement (0.38 per star)
| Quality signal | Measured | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors & bus-factor | 2 recent contributors — concentrated | 20% | +0 |
| Commit recency | last commit 0d ago | 20% | +20 |
| Commit cadence | 2279 commits in 90 days | 15% | +15 |
| Issue close ratio | 15% of issues closed | 15% | +2 |
| Release cadence | 50 releases in 12 months | 15% | +15 |
| Stars (log-damped) | 3,047 stars (log-damped) | 15% | +12 |
| Quality subtotal (Q) | 100% | 64 | |
Authenticity multiplier (A)
× 1.00- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- ✓ Engagement-to-star ratio: healthy engagement (0.38 per star)
Quality 64 × authenticity 1.00 = 64/100
Quality signals add up to the subtotal, then the authenticity multiplier discounts bought-star and bot-stargazer patterns. How scores are calculated.