← OpenCodeReview
How OpenCodeReview scored an A+.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
A+
95/100
GitHub credibility score
code
92/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 46 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 5d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 418 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 75% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 100 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 48,229 stars (log-damped)
- ↓ Star authenticity: engagement of 0.11 per star — star signal discounted by 4%
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
80/100- ✓ Organisation: Built by Alibaba · notable organization (verified: No verified-domain badge and no website field observed on the org profile at check time; profile shows display name Alibaba, description "Alibaba Open Source", location Hangzhou, China.)
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last release 3d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
community
Not measured- – Community: no community signal yet — nobody has recommended it, posted about it, or shared it on Hacker News
Identity did not lower this score. Identity can only ever add. It did not raise the average for OpenCodeReview, so the score shown is the one it would have without it. The component is still listed above, with its real value.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.