How OpenWiki scored an A+.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
GitHub credibility score
code
89/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 36 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 4d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 289 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 69% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 29 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 17,397 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- – Dependent repos: not measurable — no package listing on a registry we can query
identity
80/100- ✓ Organisation: Built by LangChain · notable organization (verified: No verified-domain badge shown on the org profile at check time; profile website https://www.langchain.com, display name LangChain, description "The agent engineering platform.", location United States of America.)
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 4d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
community
36/100- – Recommends: no recommends from gate-passing builders yet
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 2 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool
- – Signal depth: sparse data — this is an early reading from very few data points
Identity and Community did not lower this score. Identity and Community can only ever add. They did not raise the average for OpenWiki, so the score shown is the one it would have without them. The components are still listed above, with their real values.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.