How OrcaReplay scored a B.

A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.

01 / Breakdown

Derived from GitHub, not voted.

65/100

GitHub credibility score

code
50/100
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 4 recent contributors — concentrated
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 21d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 265 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 100% of issues closed
- ↓ Release cadence: 0 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 280 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- ↓ Dependent repos: no public repos depend on it yet
identity
Not measured
- – Identity: no verified provenance yet
audits
Not measured
- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100
- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 21d ago — standard-churn tools are expected to ship about every 120d
- ✓ Registry listing: still listed on a registry 0d ago
community
Not measured
- – Community: no community signal yet — nobody has recommended it, posted about it, or shared it on Hacker News

Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.