← PowerMem
How PowerMem scored a B.
Public-signal score, discounted for bought-star and bot-stargazer patterns — not a user rating. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
B
79/100
GitHub credibility score
- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor — 15 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency — last commit 6d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence — 153 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio — 90% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence — 21 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped) — 761 stars (log-damped)
- ↓ Star authenticity — star velocity 5.5× baseline — burst discounted
- ✓ Engagement-to-star ratio — healthy engagement (1.08 per star)
| Quality signal | Measured | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors & bus-factor | 15 recent contributors | 20% | +6 |
| Commit recency | last commit 6d ago | 20% | +20 |
| Commit cadence | 153 commits in 90 days | 15% | +15 |
| Issue close ratio | 90% of issues closed | 15% | +14 |
| Release cadence | 21 releases in 12 months | 15% | +15 |
| Stars (log-damped) | 761 stars (log-damped) | 15% | +10 |
| Quality subtotal (Q) | 100% | 80 | |
Authenticity multiplier (A)
× 0.99- ↓ Star authenticity — star velocity 5.5× baseline — burst discounted
- ✓ Engagement-to-star ratio — healthy engagement (1.08 per star)
Quality 80 × authenticity 0.99 = 79/100
Quality signals add up to the subtotal; the authenticity multiplier then discounts bought-star / bot-stargazer patterns. How scores are calculated.