How Pydantic AI scored an A.
A way.space signal summary built from public evidence. It is not a user rating, and not a safety certification. How scores are calculated.
01 / Breakdown
Derived from GitHub, not voted.
GitHub credibility score
code
73/100- ✓ Contributors & bus-factor: 9 recent contributors
- ✓ Commit recency: last commit 0d ago
- ✓ Commit cadence: 2089 commits in 90 days
- ✓ Issue close ratio: 75% of issues closed
- ✓ Release cadence: 100 releases in 12 months
- ✓ Stars (log-damped): 20,855 stars (log-damped)
- – Star authenticity: star-velocity check unavailable — GitHub no longer publishes stargazer timestamps for this repo
- ↓ Dependent repos: no public repos depend on it yet
identity
80/100- ✓ Organisation: Built by Pydantic · notable organization (verified: Org profile shows a Verified badge stating the organization pydantic controls the domain pydantic.dev; profile website https://pydantic.dev, description "Pydantic, Pydantic Logfire and Pydantic AI".)
- ✓ Person: Created by Samuel Colvin · notable person
audits
Not measured- – Third-party scans: no third-party scan data from listed registries
freshness
100/100- ✓ Last shipped: last commit 0d ago — fast-churn frameworks are expected to ship about every 60d
- ✓ Registry listing: still listed on a registry 0d ago
community
59/100- ✓ Recommends: credibility-weighted recommend mass 1.0 from 1 builder
- ✓ Hacker News mentions: 19 Hacker News stories pointing at this tool
Identity and Community did not lower this score. Identity and Community can only ever add. They did not raise the average for Pydantic AI, so the score shown is the one it would have without them. The components are still listed above, with their real values.
Components that could not be measured are left out of the average entirely, and their weight is redistributed, never scored as zero. Identity and Community are left out the same way when they would not have raised the score. How scores are calculated.